Training Analysis

by old_man_biking

Downloads: 2,939 (12) • Reviews: 3




Jan 14, 2016

Average Power discrepancy

Average Power discrepancy

Postby FranR » Mon Jul 27, 2015 5:46 am


I am noticing a discrepancy in AP figures in the Critical power tab.

As you can see in the attached image, CP20 for this ride is 228W, while the average power for this segment in the graph above shows an average of 233,7W.

cp.JPG (186.74 KiB) Viewed 3587 times

Since the graph value is higher, my initial assumption was that maybe calculation of figures in the graph are done using the Standard ST AP calculation, not including zero values... but I am finding other instances where graph averages are lower than corresponding CP values, which kind of ruins my theory (see second screen grab).

cp2.JPG (81.78 KiB) Viewed 3587 times

Can this possibly be a bug, or is there an explanation I am missing?
Posts: 62
Joined: Wed Nov 07, 2012 3:21 pm

Re: Average Power discrepancy

Postby pkiszk » Sat Aug 08, 2015 2:05 am

A somewhat related question - is it possible to modify the average power for a selected section of the graph to normalised power ? Ie, when I do an interval during workout and want to compare its NP with another interval from a different day but for the same duration I can only check average power but not NP. Or is there another way to look for NP data for selected sections of the graph/workout ?

Posts: 16
Joined: Wed Jan 22, 2014 6:26 am

Re: Average Power discrepancy

Postby tndmbkr » Sat Aug 08, 2015 9:32 am

The calculation of an average value by ST3core is affected by the chosen smoothing factor.
Calculations in TA are not affected by smoothing.
In TA the smoothing only helps you to achieve a nice looking chart.

PS; Is this question related to this post?
Posts: 233
Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2012 2:39 am
Location: Rotterdam

Return to Training Analysis

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests