![]() |
Training Loadby mechgt Downloads: 12,931 •
|
|
texmurphy wrote:There has been discussion elsewhere about charting weight with monthly distance. The TrainingLoad Plugin already graphs various weight metrics but does not have a chart for distance.
Seems to me that it would be easy to add a chart showing cummulitive distance, maybe with option to reset distance at each week, or month, or year break.
gerhard wrote:I have divided the HR zones so each zone is just a couple of beats to reduce margin effects. When studying similar activities (distance, route, TSB, fitness) but different effort (time, average HR), the TSS seem to relate more to the distance than the perceived effort. It therefore seems like I should have steeper factor. I have played around a little with the factors, but getting the exponential curve manually is a little hard.
Can the steepness of the curve be customized or is the factors scientific?
gerhard wrote:Exception:
* Click table header - get exception below. If graph is selected instead, table is back
TX911 wrote:I agree the TRIMP seems to weight time more heavily than intensity. Maybe it's designed for runners who cover more distance per unit time than I do
I'm going to play around a bit with the factors myself.
gerhard wrote:...
the TSS seem to relate more to the distance than the perceived effort. It therefore seems like I should have steeper factor. I have played around a little with the factors, but getting the exponential curve manually is a little hard.
Can the steepness of the curve be customized or is the factors scientific?
VERSION 1.2.3
Changes:
- Bugfix: exception when sorting a column on the main page with no activities listed
- Bugfix: empty activity list sometimes when using the back button
- Added ToolTips and ToolTip resources entries for localization
- Allowed for future activities (enable forecasting)
- Added option for category to only filter activity list (not CTL/ATL/TSB charts)
- Added several languages
- Added Name column to ListSettings
- Added DynamicZones setting to calculate TRIMP based on current (at time of activity) HRrest & HRmax.
- Added tooltips and removed info box
- Re-arranged settings page a little
mechgt wrote:Allowed for future activities (enable forecasting)
HENNES wrote:What does the TL-tool need to start calcs (or maybe what do I need to prevent from looking into the future)? Obviously we need a heartrate, which we dont have for future runs - or?
HENNES wrote:Should we type in an "average rate" we expect? Would that be sufficient. Or does it need real data minute by minute? Could I copy an old activity into the future with real data and see how the "indicators" perform?
HENNES wrote:Is that "in line" with your findings?
HENNES wrote:What does the TL-tool need to start calcs (or maybe what do I need to prevent from looking into the future)?
Switch wrote:You need a duration and an average heart rate. I guess you should be able to include that in your planning.
mechgt wrote:HENNES wrote:What does the TL-tool need to start calcs (or maybe what do I need to prevent from looking into the future)?Switch wrote:You need a duration and an average heart rate. I guess you should be able to include that in your planning.
clackerz wrote:Having this will assist in developing some meaningful training - even if I'm not training for anything specific.
mechgt wrote:I get the same feeling sometimes... TRIMP wants volume... I don't have an answer for this. It's really hard to get a shorter intense workout to give you the same score as a longer less intense workout.
The calculation is scientific in the sense that it's backed by research papers. It's the only thing I've found from what I would consider to be a scientifically derived resource. If anyone else has information on factors, reply or shoot me a PM or something and I'll take a look at it.
HENNES wrote:Can somebody who is familar with this indicators tell anything from the plain numbers of the outcome of the 2, i.e. which is faster/slower. Or would one need more data before the event to judge?
HENNES wrote:So Im reading, reading, reading as probably many people here do now - just to throw in a practical question.
This are numbers from 2 Marathons from me:
Can somebody who is familar with this indicators tell anything from the plain numbers of the outcome of the 2, i.e. which is faster/slower. Or would one need more data before the event to judge?
thanks
Switch wrote:First things first: respect! Half marathon under 1:30![]()
What strikes me as odd, is the small changes in TSB. Example: 29.11. where TSB only changed 5 points. If I remember correctly (can't check right now) my TSB changes are much higher.
@Hennes: what zone settings are you using?
Users browsing this forum: MSN [Bot] and 0 guests